eppy wrote:
The fact that the experimental data fits in most part the standard modell is really meaningless.
I concur. I have posted else where:
Quote:
“The standard model of particle physics assumes that neutrinos are massless. In order for neutrino oscillations to occur, some neutrinos must have masses. Therefore, the standard model of particle physics must be revised.”
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/phys ... es/bahcall Others have written...
Quote:
CERN says: "THE COLLISIONS HAVE LESS ENERGY THAN A FEW FLYING MOSQUITOS, so must be safe."
False analogy. The energy of the neutrons (mosquitos) that triggered the exponential process (E=mc²) in the TRINITY ATOM BOMB TEST 1945 in the New Mexico Desert was many orders of magnitude less than this, but STARTED AN EXPONENTIALLY INCREASING PROCESS (E=mc²)...During the short time the U235 is explosively brought to a supercritical state (E=mc²), EVEN ONE SLOW NEUTRON (mosquito) causing (E=mc²)fission is sufficient.
It's not the 'M A S S/energy' (mosquito) involved, it's; the 'C A T A L Y T I C' (E=mc²) effect of these sub-atomic explosions at dangerously high energy levels, not 'just' the effect on the particles themselves. It Does'nt take much energy to light a fuse
Quote:
E=mc²: 103 years later [Nov '08], Einstein’s proven (corroborate) correct.
It's taken more than a century, but Einstein's celebrated formula E=mc² has finally been corroborated, thanks to a heroic computational effort by French, German and Hungarian physicists.
http://www.physorg.com/news146415074.html Einstein proven correct, again, this year…
Quantum gravity theories wiped out by a gamma ray burst. Gamma-ray observations shrink known grain size of spacetime. Fermi captures space-time theory evidence…
New results are in from the Fermi Space Telescope, which settled into orbit in the summer of 2008, and the findings seem to prove Albert Einstein right once again.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80bea ... ein-right/Others have pointed out the fact that (doctors of [to be clear - not doctors of science] 'philosophy'/hocus pocus/hand waving/pseudo-science/selling religion as science, at best.,etc) delusional physicists have yet to accurately explain the super fluid, super conductive, quark ball, black hole (quark condensate) analogue created at RHIC in 2005 with a mere 10th of the energy available at LHC, but careless, unaccountable, politicians continue to allot them more energy (good idea, not).
Hence, the hypocrisy of (zombie) democracy.
Quote:
Horatiu Nastase says his calculations show that the core of the fireball has a striking similarity to a black hole.
His work has been published on the pre-print website arxiv.org and is reported in New Scientist magazine.
When the gold nuclei smash into each other they are broken down into particles called quarks and gluons.
These form a ball of plasma about 300 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. This fireball, which lasts just 10 million, billion, billionths of a second, can be detected because it absorbs jets of particles produced by the beam collisions.
But Nastase, of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, says there is something unusual about it.
Ten times as many jets were being absorbed by the fireball as were predicted by calculations.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4357613.stm Other substantiating evidence that CERN (and collaborator's/advocates) baseless E8 paper and standard models are not worth the paper they are written on...
Quote:
Just last year HubbleSite Newscenter released an update on baryonic matter. By studying light along sightlines to 28 quasars in the intergalactic medium IGM they have found new matter strings. The COS team hopes to observe 100 additional quasars and build up a survey of more than 10,000 hydrogen filaments in the cosmic web, many laced with heavy elements from early stars.
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archiv ... s/2008/20/ This is significant because on current theory the early stars were metal poor and considered to consist primarily of light elements. The existence of primordial micro black holes is also based on the early universe and big bang models being correctly described. As we can all see, bigbang and micro-black hole models are not correctly described.
Many pseudo-scientists, like CERN and advocates, argue the universe was filled homogeneously. This is incorrect.
Data shows quite the opposite: the universe continues to look fractal as far out as our telescopes can see.
The universe is hierarchically inhomogenously structured and clumpy, like a fractal.
Fractals: The third road...
Modeling a fractal universe with general relativity is possible in theory.
Quote:
But inferring the matter distribution from the CMB is not always simple. CMB maps show a 3D distribution projected onto a 2D surface, and it is possible for a clumpy 3D distribution to appear smooth when projected in 2D. The same is true of the X-ray background, which appears homogeneous in two dimensions. Finally, using galaxies that are bright at radio wavelengths is also problematic, as it is difficult to measure their distances accurately enough to pinpoint their positions in 3D.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14200 I think this essay is my favorite of them all and sums it up the best...
Quote:
E8 model of the universe
Posted in Uncategorized on May 11, 2008 by Admin
An alternative to Standard Model
* a speculation to establish an alternative Standard Model of physics
* to replace data based Standard Model with a rule based model
* In physics rule based models are valued the most
Philosophers stone
* Scholastic doctors’ never ending quest to discover the philosophers stone
* Today’s Doctors of philosophy call the old philosophers stone the theory of everything.
* Physicists are the Doctors of Philosophy and their philosophers stone is called the theory of everything.
* the philosophers stone that turns the base Standard Model into the gold of E8.
* Like all claims of the discovery of a philosophers stone E8 too is baseless
No standard of evidence
* In scholastic physics there are no standard of evidence.
* Without a standard of evidence any discussion among doctors quickly deteriorates into an assertion of authority.
* The level of scientific discourse in academic physics is lower than sci.physics newsgroup.
Authority is the currency
* The currency of scholasticism is authority.
* The content serves only as fodder to assert authority.
* Only doctors of same rank will communicate with each other. Here communicate means to thrash the other's work to elevate one's own work
* That's the only reason a doctor would comment on another doctor's work.
* E8 paper has already been canonized by the editors of the news media who know nothing about the subject.
Medicine and physics
* Imagine if medicine worked the same way as academic physics.
* And it did up to early 20th century. Instead of conducting lengthy clinical trials, medical practitioners were free to push to the market cure-all medicines and miraculous methods making self-serving unverified and unverifiable claims.
* The fact that the elixir sold by doctors of philosophy is theoretical does not mean that it should be legal.
Today we are at the same position humanity was two thousand years ago. In Thales' time the Big Media and Doctors of Philosophy colluded to create an entertaining religion and sold it to the people as science. The institutions we now call Big Media and Scholasticism had different names two thousand years ago but their function in society was the same: to corrupt science to manipulate human beings.
== Newton is the most potent hallucinogenic ==
When statements are simplified to a state in which there are no hidden symbols, the public
jury which is evaluating this case will be on the same level as the Doctor. This will
eliminate the authority of the Doctor. But don't count the Doctor out as yet.
in order to reassert his authority the Doctor will claim to see symbols which are not in the
proportionality. For instance, if you write 1/r a Doctor will see an F in 1/r. If you are an
average rational human being with average visual perception skills you would not see an F in
1/r.
A Doctor will also see other letters such M and m in 1/r. (Note that in scholastic physics
nature is case sensitive.) Then the Doctor will see a G in 1/r. You would start to question
yourself: Is this me or is this the Doctor who is hallucinating? It is the Doctor who is
hallucinating. Newton is the most potent hallucinogenic known to scholasticism. It took this
Doctor 15 long years to learn how to read R3T2 as Newton's laws. He will not give up now. It
is too late for him to become a rational human being. The Doctor cannot change his ingrained Newtonist dogma of atomic materialism. Doctors live in a world which is filled entirely with Newton's Soul. We must pity poor Doctors of Philosophy. [edit] I do not pity them while they are poised, ready and preparing to completely annihilate and destroy our planet.
We must also set the standards of evidence and ask the Doctors to meet the standards of evidence. As an example: There comes Doctor of Philosophy Lisa Randall into to the court and says "here's my Goto-Mambu action and here's my mambo-jumbo derivation of it, therefore the universe is 11 dimensional."
We would say to Lisa Randall: "Simplify please." Nature does not recognize academic mumbo jumbo or any scholastic loaded symbols named after some scholastic grand master.
Doctor Randall will refuse to simplify. Instead, she will try to assert her authority and she
will offer to popularize. We don't want popularization. We want simplification. Lisa Randall knows that if she simplifies she will end up with an identity or a proportionality. She will lose her authority if what she is offering as proof of her absurd theories is legible to us as well. This is the requirement of public legibility. This is the enforcement of accountability which is lacking in academic physics. Without accountability there is no science.
http://de5ign.wordpress.com/ CERN and collaborators are the criminal now. They have now, irrefutably, demonstrated their blatant [observed] failure to submit a u.s. environmental impact statement as required by law. They have, irrefutably, demonstrated zero adherence to (also, observed and as required by law) precautionary principle.
CERN and advocates have now, irrefutably, proven beyond a doubt that their standard model is not (neutrino masses/gravity side lined/mass misunderstood.,etc) worth the paper it's written on.
CERN and collaborators, in fact, operate above the law, therefore; meeting or exceeding the definition of "criminal".
Quote:
GAL - and The End Of The World As We Know It. Complainants were arguing that an earlier case, in which a contractual dispute against CERN was rejected on the grounds of the Organization's
immunity from suit before the domestic tribunals of Member States, meant that the requirement to "exhaust domestic remedies" had effectively been obviated).
http://globaladminlaw.blogspot.com/2009 ... nd-of.html Quote:
Martin Shapiro - amongst many others - has cast doubt on the assumptions underlying the preference for technocratic deliberation. Technocracy vs. Democracy...
http://www.iilj.org/GAL/documents/10120511_Shapiro.pdf It appears CERN does not comprehend nor care about "civil" discourse. Is "irrational" (and violence?) the only language/syntax/discourse they understand? Yes?
Quote:
"Protocol on the
Privileges and Immunities of the European Organization for Nuclear Research."
http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/ ... nuclearrsc CERN and advocates, like the challenger space shuttle disaster: they could prove no risk, so they launched it anyways...Systematic downgrading of technical issues.
Quote:
Toby Ord and his colleagues at the Future of Humanity Institute at the University of Oxford gives pause for thought. In the real world, this can be serious. To take a topical example, until recently, people who are supposed to know about such things were utterly confident that serious financial crises were a thing of the past. Financial mathematics of supposedly unprecedented sophistication said so. Just look at us now.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... -safe.html On Israeli conflicts in the middle east. Not only does Israel not care about CERN's dangerous lack of precautionary principle; they are assisting in LHC's funding, construction and operation. Israeli's are as unaccountable as all the other countries involved with LHC - more concerned about, ponzi scheming, profits than (safety) analytics.
Quote:
Israel became an Observer State in 1991, following an Agreement to contribute funds to CERN to be used to support Israeli scientists working at CERN,
http://external-relations.web.cern.ch/E ... srael.html This is the thanks the world gets for liberating the jews from germany and the death camps? Israel is now assisting in the potential annihilation-mass genocide of the entire world? Israel takes pleasure in applying zero precautionary principle to the entire planet?
Could this be one of the unwritten reasons why so many islamists and others hate Israel and it's allies?
Total irony.
Israel does not care about you or your planet:
http://www.gov.il/firstgov/englishCERN, selling religion as science:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-science/I and others, also, argue...CERN and advocates are suffering from (replace the words 'god' and 'bible' with 'theories' and 'math') the god delusion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_DelusionMore evidence, including but not limited to, that there is a lot more to all this [missing/hidden variables] than meets the eye...
Quote:
April 29, 2008
An international team of researchers may, just may, have made a radical breakthrough that could rewrite physics and chemistry textbooks.
They claim to have discovered a naturally occurring element with an atomic number (number of protons) of 122 — 30 notches on the periodic table ahead of uranium, long considered the heaviest naturally occurring element.
For decades, physicists have been making artificial elements in supercolliders, only to see most of their creations disintegrate within a short time.
Most elements above atomic number 100 are inherently unstable and get progressively more usntable as you travel upward. The highest discovered one, ununoctium or atomic number 118, has a half-life of 89 milliseconds.
But according to theory, there exists an "island of stability" further out along the periodic table where certain configurations of protons and neutrons would create superheavy but also superstable elements.
So a team led by Amnon Marinov of the Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem took a different approach. They figured that if superheavy, superstable elements really are possible, then they ought to already exist in nature.
Taking a relatively large amount of thorium, a natural element with the atomic number 90, they fired each and every nucleus in the pile through a mass spectrometer, which catches the atomic weight of nuclei (protons plus neutrons) by analyzing how beams of ions pass through them.
The two isotopes of thorium, with atomic weights of 230 and 232, were most abundant, as were various impurities in the sample.
But there was something else—something with an atomic weight of 292, something never before seen.
The researchers aren't certain, but they figure their unknown substance probably has an atomic number of 122, whose slot on the periodic table already has the temporary name "ununbibium," or "one-two-two-bium."
They also figure its half-life is at least 100 million years—meaning the shores of the long-sought "island of stability" may finally have been reached.
They're ruled out various errors, and are ready to defend their paper, posted Thursday on the math and physics Web site arXiv.org:
Superheavy element found
The hunt for superheavy elements has focused banging various heavy nuclei together and hoping they’ll stick. In this way, physicists have extended the periodic table by manufacturing elements 111, 112, 114, 116 and 118, albeit for vanishingly small instants. Although none of these elements is particularly long lived, they don’t have progressively shorter lives and this is taken as evidence that islands of nuclear stability exist out there and that someday we’ll find stable superheavy elements.
But if these superheavy nuclei are stable, why don’t we find them already on Earth? Turns out we do; they’ve been here all along. The news today is that a group led by Amnon Marinov at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem has found the first naturally occuring superheavy nuclei by sifting through a large pile of the heavy metal thorium.
What they did was fire one thorium nucleus after another through a mass spectrometer to see how heavy each was. Thorium has an atomic number of 90 and occurs mainly in two isotopes with atomic weights of 230 and 232. All these showed up in the measurements along with a various molecular oxides and hydrides that form for technical reasons.
But something else showed up too. An element with a weight of 292 and an atomic number of around 122. That’s an extraordinary claim and quite rightly the team has been diligent in attempting to exclude alternative explanations such as th epresence of exotic molecules formed from impurities in the thorium sample or from the hydrocarbon in oil used in the vacuum pumping equipment). But these have all been ruled out, say Marinov and his buddies.
What they’re left with is the discovery of the first superheavy element, probably number 122.
What do we know about 122? Marinov and co say it has a half life in excess of 100 million years and occurs with an abundance of between 1 and 10 x10^-12, relative to thorium, which is a fairly common element (about as abundant as lead).
Theorists have mapped out the superheavy periodic table and 122 would be a member of the superheavy actinide group. It even has a name: eka-thorium or unbibium. Welcome to our world!
This may well open the flood gates to other similar discoveries. Uranium is the obvious next place to look for superheavy actinides. I’d bet good money that Marinov and his pals are eyeballing the stuff as I write.
The paper, “Evidence for a long-lived superheavy nucleus with atomic mass number A = 292 and atomic number Z @ 122 in natural Th” is available here:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0804.3869v1The posting at ArXiv Blog:
http://arxivblog.com/?p=385http://www.rdmag.com/News/2008/04/Resea ... um-rdquo;/ Conclusion: CERN and (government.,etc) advocates are tantamount to clueless five year old children playing with matches (our planet and our lives). They are absolutely 100% scientifically illiterate and (ponzi scheming) careless, while affording our entire planet (zero precautionary principle) less safety rating than a passenger jet.
Selling [ponzi scheming] religion as science: CERN
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principleAccurate alternatives to filling in the missing blanks to the periodic table of elements that CERN is, intentionally, not interested in...
Quote:
cellular automata, Rule 110 is the only one for which this has been proven.
While working on the development of NKS, Wolfram's research assistant Matthew Cook proved Rule 110 capable of supporting universal computation. Rule 110 is a simple enough system to suggest that naturally occurring physical systems may also be capable of universality— meaning that many of their properties will be undecidable, and not amenable to closed-form mathematical solutions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_110 Rule 110 not amenable to closed-form mathematical solutions provided by (delusional) CERN and illiterate advocates.
Quote:
Some living things use naturally occurring cellular automata in their functioning.
Patterns of some seashells, like the ones in Conus and Cymbiola genus, are generated by natural CA. The pigment cells reside in a narrow band along the shell's lip. Each cell secretes pigments according to the activating and inhibiting activity of its neighbour pigment cells, obeying a natural version of a mathematical rule.[citation needed] The cell band leaves the colored pattern on the shell as it grows slowly. For example, the widespread species Conus textile bears a pattern resembling the Rule 30 CA described above.[citation needed]
Plants regulate their intake and loss of gases via a CA mechanism. Each stoma on the leaf acts as a cell.[8]
Neural networks can be used as cellular automata, too. The complex moving wave patterns on the skin of cephalopods are a good display of corresponding activation patterns in the animals' brain.[9]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_automaton The LHC is *so* 1980's.
Will all draconian (ape science?) LHC advocates continue to live with their heads buried in the sand? Can LHC and (RHIC/tevatron.,etc) advocates be stopped without violence?
Quote:
LHC advocates argue that the LHC is not within U.S. jurisdiction, therefore; not held accountable to U.S. policy, but...U.S. funding and operation of lhc grid network (and CMS/ATLAS.,etc) within the geographic U.S.
does fall under U.S. policy pervue.
U.S. involvement with LHC: smoke and mirrors tactics.
Politicians who fund and assist operation of LHC through careless funding are scientifically illiterate. CERN and advocates exploit this vulnerability.
Who are the lesser of two (analogy) evils here? The politicians who, unaccountably, permit this continual exploitation of (world destroying potential academic fraud) tax base funds or people like CERN and Wallstreet who continue to exploit these vulnerabilities?
Another great (no shortage of definitions and adjectives for CERN!) definition of CERN LHC and advocates:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_elephantA white elephant (LHC!) is a valuable possession of which its owner (CERN!) cannot dispose and whose cost (particularly cost of upkeep) is out of proportion to its (world destroying capability) usefulness or (create more questions than answers) worth.
